„Eine Boeing 757 rast in einem aberwitzigen 270 Grad Flugmanöver in´s Pentagon.
ein hochartistisches Flugmanöver mit einer Boeing 757 eines Mannes, der einmal
kurz eine Flugstunde in einer kleiner Maschine gemacht hat.“ …
„Ich fordere jeden Piloten heraus … er soll mit einer Boeing 757 mit 400 Knoten eine halbe
Meile 6 m über den Boden fliegen – keine Chance – es ist aerodynamisch nicht
möglich. Anzunehmen, dass dieses angebliche Flugzeug mit einem Amateur am Steuer
solche Manöver durchführen konnte, ist lächerlich.“
The Power Of Imagery
Television is – and has always been – a Weapon of Mass Distraction. The power of TV-imagery was the driving force behind the 9/11 deception.
Whenever a major news event is reported by the mainstream media, it will invariably be illustrated with photographs or videos in order to convey to the public some visual impressions of the event. Undeniably, the imagery connected with any given news story enhances our emotional relation to it. The way we relate to news imagery has an almost hypnotic effect on our psyche: we have come to consider the visuals of any given news story as proof of that news story’s authenticity. This is truly a ‘weak spot’ of our brains’ readiness for critical-thinking. Thus follows, unfortunately, that to challenge the authenticity of a catastrophic event shown on Live TV is way beyond what most people are willing to contemplate. However, the time has come for everyone to call television by its most appropriate, military-sounding name: „Weapon of Mass Distraction“.
The 9/11 psyop relied foremostly on that ‘weak spot’ of ours. We all fell for the images we saw on TV at the time – understandably so, as the sheer horror of the proposed imagery generated a wall of outrage and fear – thick enough to discourage any critical review of it. In hindsight, we can only wonder why so few questioned the absurd TV coverage proposed by all the major networks. The picture at left shows a moment (at 8:59AM) of the four synchronized TV broadcasts of ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX: yet another indication that the 9/11 TV „LIVE“ broadcasts were managed by one single, centralized studio. (see my audio analysis in September Clues E)
WHAT TELEVISION VIEWERS SAW ON 9/11 The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie. It featured for the most part what were meant to be “chopper shots” of the smoking towers – and very little else. The sum total of “Action Shots” (“Planecrash” and “Tower collapses”) amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning’s TV broadcasts ! Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie, none of these “Action Shots” depicted any sort of reality. Now, it may be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most crucial aspect of the entire operation – and needs to be fully understood in its plain logic: The unprecedented WTC demolition job was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV – (or to let any amateur cameraman capture it on film). The 9/11 conspirators had no intention whatsoever to offer such a „pyrotechnical“ spectacle to world scrutiny – just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have been. Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of covert military ops was used: smokescreens. More recent technology deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area. In reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke (military obscurants) as they collapsed – and no real footage exists of that brief event. Thankfully – for all normal people of this world – the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew : in their efforts to simulate reality, their crass ‚artistry‘ and countless mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery – forever engraved in the TV archives. <size=“7″>These images are an intolerable insult to human intelligence : A REAL PLANE CRASH ?___________________________A REAL SKYSCRAPER COLLAPSE ?
WHY FAKE THE NEWS BROADCASTS ? The 9/11 TV broadcasts were designed to ‘sell’ a fictitious terror attack to the world– by replacing the real-life events of the day (the WTC demolitions) with fake imagery. The official story was quite surreal – as were the TV images of the day and the preposterous tale of 19 kids roundly outfoxing the US Air Defense. It is essential to judge with one’s own eyes the broadcasts actually aired by ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC and CNN. WHAT ABOUT THE „AMATEUR“ VIDEOS ? All the other videos (endlessly replayed on TV) were released only later. They have all been extensively analyzed by scores of video analysts; each and every video snippet of „amateur imagery“ has been methodically dissected and compared – and empirically proved to be nothing else than computer-generated fabrications. HOW WERE PRIVATE VIDEOS IMPEDED ? In order for the 9/11 TV-deception to succeed,full visual control of the Manhattan area had to be in place. The existence of EMP/HERF technology is undisputable: only the hypothesis of it being used on 9/11 remains unverifiable. It is, however, a reasonable postulation supported by a series of electronic blackouts which occurred in NYC that morning. In any event, the logic of using EMP/HERF holds water and effectively explains the ruse with disarming simplicity: NO private photography of the real-life events was allowed: thus, the imagery aired by the TV networks feared no comparison and was passed off as reality.